True Co-Operation
How to spark a co-operation between people and projects?
–
I have many friends who work towards a vision of making the world a better place for all. I view all of their projects as working towards a shared vision. Even if some visions are more specific, some are more abstract (specific words to describe a vision change based on progress and often seeing a commonality depends on one's imagination and a set of values, i.e. willigness to collaborate).
I often observe that my friends projects are great at some parts - some are great at technology, some at communication and design, some at networking, fundraising or business models. But only together these projects would create something valuable for all.
What is true cooperation?
Doing together. Not always everyone does an equal part (of the amount of time or quality), because some people are better at doing the ground work, while others - at bringing in resources etc. The level of experience differs. Timing plays a role too, some work needs to happen before others jumps in. I think that's how it is. Intention to "just add some ingredient to the soup" is the most important.
Self-motivated parts. Holocracy is an interesting management model, where all parts are self-motivated to create a whole that's more than parts. Figuring one's personal motivation and a project's vision brings in clarity, before co-operation with others starts.
Clear communication, even with different tools. I notice how some of my friends love text, others - drawings, code or audios. That means, some can explain very clearly typing the words, while others just sketch the concept or send an audio recording (unable to type the text or to sketch). Noticing the differences between people, so that we connect to do together is important. Sometimes that means translating someone's text into a visual or typing the audio into text, so that everyone is more on the same page.
Possible steps for True Cooperation?
-
Being visible - showcasing each others projects to one another
-
Being transparent - sharing about Challenges and Needs they have, so that others can help out
-
Being flexible - welcoming the help and adjusting one's actions to move together
Curious, what do you think about Co-Operation, how does it happen and why it doesn't happen?
Restoration of right relationship between one another and the living earth; ultimately the abolition of the concept of property and extractive capitalism.
通常、チームをまとめるのは実行可能で信頼できるビジョンです。
特定のワールドビジョンが十分に信頼でき、価値があり、実行可能である場合（=探索の意味ではなく、実装の意味で、真の意味で実行可能）。
そのビジョンは、通常、誰か、通常は「方法」を理解し、「方法」を詳細に説明する「アイデア」を共有し、ビジョンに信憑性を与える人々によって提供されます。たとえば、ロケットをスタンドに着陸させるというアイデアは単なるアイデアですが、自動制御の原則により、その信念に基づいて真の協力を得ることができる人々にとっては信じられないアイデアです。
同様に、分散型コンピューター、またはソーラーセイルと高出力レーザーの作成方法に関するホワイトペーパーは、特定のこと（分散型ガバナンスや他のスターへの到達など）が可能であり、取り組む価値があると人々に信じ込ませる可能性があります。これがどのようにさらに進化するかは、多くの場合、友情、リーダーシップ、コワーキングなどの特定のコミュニケーション行為に依存します。
実行可能なビジョンを思いつくことは、良いアイデアを書くことと同じくらい難しいですが、それは私たちが少し何かをすると何か大きなことはその結果です。 :)
「どのように」を詳細に説明することは控えめに言うことはできません。アイデアを抽象的に説明することはできます。アイデアはすべて説明されていると思いますが、プロセスのステップと何が起こるかを説明するまで、他の人はそれを理解できません。その結果、目が光り、「そうそう、いいアイデアだな、やってみよう！」と思い、協力が始まります。
Usually, it is the executable, believable vision, that brings teams together.
If a certain world vision is sufficiently believable and valuable, and executable (=actionable in the true sense, not in the sense of exploration, but in the sense of implementation).
That vision, is usually provided by someone, usually, the people who have figured out the 'how', and shared an 'idea' that describes the 'how' in detail, and thus gives the believability to the vision. For example, the idea of landing a rocket back on its stand, is just an idea, but with the automated control principles, it is a believable idea to the people who can then have true cooperation on the basis of that belief.
Similarly, a whitepaper about how to create a decentralized computer, or a solar sail and high powered lasers, may make people believe that certain things (like decentralized governance, or reaching other stars) is possible, and worth working for. How this evolves further, often depends on the specific acts of communication: friendships, leaderships, co-working, etc.
Coming up with an executable vision is as hard as writing a good idea, however, it is something that comes up in each of our minds as hyptheses, that if we do something a little, something bigger is gonna result from that. :)
Describing the 'how' in detail can't be understated: one can explain an idea abstractly, thinking that one has described all there is to it, but others won't understand it until you describe it in steps of a process and what happens as a result -- then, their eyes light up, and they think "oh yeah, that's a great idea, let's do it!", and then a possible cooperation begins.
[+]
人々はどのようにしてビジョンを想像し、想像し、洗練することを学ぶことができますか？誰もがそのようなスキルを持っているわけではないと思います。 「何が欲しいの？」という簡単な質問でも。状況と時点によって異なります。
私にとって、想像することは物ではなくプロセスです。そして、人々が一緒にそのビジョンを発見する旅に出るとき、一緒に想像することが可能です。ここでは、協力はすべての人の個々のビジョンの完成を待つ必要はありませんが、むしろ一緒に研究することが可能なスペースです。
How can people learn to imagine and envision, refine the Visions? I'd say not everyone has such a skill. Even a simple question of "What do you want?" depends on a situation and point in time.
To me, envisioning is a process rather than a thing. Then, envisioning together is possible, when people go on the journey of discovering that Vision together. Here, co-operation does not need to wait for a perfection of everyone's individual vision, but rather a space where researching together is possible.
おそらく、アイデアをより多くのサブ問題に分割する必要があります。
次に、各人が作業表現の受信トレイを持つことができます。
コロケーションには物理的なスペースが必要です。私たちの仕事のプレゼンテーション。値の相互参照。
クイズをしたり、興味のある言葉を記入したりできれば、同じアイデアを検討している人たちと一緒にできるかもしれません。
おそらく、カテゴリMindeyと可能な追加の相互作用が必要です。 「私はこれを支持します」と「私はこれに取り組むことに興味があります」のように
Perhaps we need to break ideas up into more subproblems.
Then each person can have an inbox of work representation.
We need physical spaces for colocation. Presentations of our work. Value cross referencing.
If I could do a quiz and fill out words I am interested in then maybe I can be joined with people who are looking into the same ideas.
Perhaps we need additional interactions possible with categories Mindey. Like "I support this" and "I am interested in working on this"
Gyuri Lajosが取り組んできたIndihubエコシステムは、本質的に発見可能性を促進します。誰もが公開しているアイデアに組み込まれている知識の共有により、人々が参加して登録しなくても、アイデアをネットワークに拡大することができます。人々のオンボーディングは、当然、時間のかかる時間のかかるプロセスです。たとえば、この投稿とこのグループのすべての投稿には、参加した少数のユーザーのみがアクセスできます。このソフトウェアがfission.codeに移植されて公開された場合、Fissionアカウントを持っている人は誰でもこの会話スレッドを検索、検索、応答できます。
The Indihub ecosystem that Gyuri Lajos has been working on intrinsically promotes discoverability. That knowledge sharing built into everyone’s publicly shared ideas promotes scaling an idea to the network without people having to join and signup. Onboarding people is naturally a slow and time consuming process. For instance, this post and all the posts in this group are only accessible to the small number of people who have joined. If this software was ported to fission.code and made public, then anyone with Fission account can search, find and respond to this conversation thread.
Redecentralizeを閲覧したところ、利用可能なすべてのプロジェクトに互換性がないことに気づきました。抽象化はすべて異なります。
クリティカルマスなしでプロジェクトを開始して完了することは非常に困難です。結果は、多くの場合、役に立たない点とは無関係です。多くの作業を行う必要があり、作業が適用できないか、十分に終了していない場合、他の人の作業を構築することさえ困難です。
先に進んで物事を成し遂げる人が必要ですが、同時に会話やアイデアの共有について話し合う必要があります。そうすれば、お互いが使用できる適切な抽象化やツールを構築できるかもしれません。
I've noticed from browsing Redecentralize that all the projects available are incompatible. The abstractions are all different.
It's very difficult to start and complete a project without critical mass. The result is often independent to the point of uselessness. A lot of work needs to be done and it's difficult to even build on other people's work if the work is not applicable or not finished enough.
We need some people to forge a path ahead and make things but at the same time we need to have conversations on conversations and sharing of ideas. Maybe then we can build the right abstractions or tools for eachother to use.
[+]